Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (SAP ASE) for Custom Applications
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 757

Performance Penatly using Partitions

$
0
0

Hi,

 

deleting 6500 rows from a partitioned table took 3-4 times longer if the table has no partitions.

 

ASE 15.5. ESD 5.3 on Solaris 64bit. Sample MonProcessActivity output for unpartitioned Table:

 

CPUTime    WaitTime    PhysicalReads LogicalReads PagesRead  PhysicalWrites PagesWritten MemUsageKB  LocksHeld  TableAccesses IndexAccesses TempDbObjects WorkTables  ULCBytesWritten ULCFlushes  ULCFlushFull ULCMaxUsage ULCCurrentUsage Transactions Commits    Rollbacks

----------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ----------- -------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- --------------- ------------ ----------- -----------

      18100      17400            0      446147          0          6808        6808        162          0        275093        19742            0          7        4464192        6550            0        2024              0        6546        6546          0

 

Partitioned Table

 

CPUTime    WaitTime    PhysicalReads LogicalReads PagesRead  PhysicalWrites PagesWritten MemUsageKB  LocksHeld  TableAccesses IndexAccesses TempDbObjects WorkTables  ULCBytesWritten ULCFlushes  ULCFlushFull ULCMaxUsage ULCCurrentUsage Transactions Commits    Rollbacks

----------- ----------- ------------- ------------ ----------- -------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------- --------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- --------------- ------------ ----------- -----------

      87600      23400            0      603242          0          6814        6814        162          0        432195        19742            0          7        4463632        6561            0        2024              0        6546        6546          0

 

Showplan for the partitioned table:

 

QUERY PLAN FOR STATEMENT 1 (at line 1).

Optimized using Parallel Mode

 

 

    STEP 1

        The type of query is DELETE.

 

    2 operator(s) under root

 

      |ROOT:EMIT Operator (VA = 2)

      |

      |  |DELETE Operator (VA = 1)

      |  |  The update mode is direct.

      |  |

      |  |  |SCAN Operator (VA = 0)

      |  |  |  FROM TABLE

      |  |  |  prognosen3_part

      |  |  |  [ Eliminated Partitions : 1 2 3 4 6 ]

      |  |  |  Index : prognosen3_aglsec

      |  |  |  Forward Scan.

      |  |  |  Positioning by key.

      |  |  |  Keys are:

      |  |  |    aglsec ASC

      |  |  |    statnr ASC

      |  |  |    modprog ASC

      |  |  |    datumsec ASC

      |  |  |    dauersec ASC

      |  |  |  Using I/O Size 16 Kbytes for index leaf pages.

      |  |  |  With LRU Buffer Replacement Strategy for index leaf pages.

      |  |  |  Using I/O Size 16 Kbytes for data pages.

      |  |  |  With LRU Buffer Replacement Strategy for data pages.

      |  |

      |  |  TO TABLE

      |  |  prognosen3_part

      |  |  Using I/O Size 16 Kbytes for data pages.

 

Showplan for the non-partitioned table is equal with exception of the partion elimination line [ Eliminated Partitions : 1 2 3 4 6 ]. I did a similar repro on 15.5 ESD#5.3 on Linux x64 which shows no performance penalty. What is a possible reason for this behavior?

 

Many thanks

 

Robert


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 757

Trending Articles